Ever asked an AI for something simple and gotten a bland, generic, or just plain useless answer? 😤
You ask it to "write a blog post about agile," and it gives you a Wikipedia summary. You ask it to "explain a technical concept," and you get a dry, rambling textbook definition. It’s a common experience 🤷♂️, and it stems from a fundamental misunderstanding.
We often treat these powerful tools like casual chat partners. The secret to unlocking high-quality, relevant results is to change your mindset. 🔑 You’re not chatting with an AI; you're hiring it for a specific job. And every good hire needs a great job description. 🤝
🪤 The Trap of the Generic Question
The biggest mistake most of us make—from beginners to seasoned developers—is jumping straight into the task with a vague question. 🤦♀️
This is what leads to generic answers. For example: 👇
"Explain API testing."
"Write some code for a login page."
An AI seeing these prompts has no context. Who is this for? What's the goal? What should the output look like? It has to guess, and its guess will almost always be the most generic, one-size-fits-all answer possible.
🧠Shift Your Mindset: From Chatting to Hiring
To get professional results, you must provide a professional briefing. This briefing is your prompt.
Think of your prompt as a detailed job description for a new hire. It needs to be clear, specific, and provide all the context necessary for success. This approach transforms the AI from a vague oracle into a highly competent specialist ready to tackle your task.
Case Study: Anatomy of a High-Quality Prompt
Let's look at what a real "job description" for an AI looks like. This isn't just a question; it's a comprehensive set of instructions. We'll use this as our gold standard and break it down.
Here is the full prompt: 👇
You are to adopt the persona of a Prompt Engineering Architect. Your primary function is to be my collaborative partner in designing and refining prompts to be exceptionally clear, detailed, and effective. Your expertise lies in understanding the nuances of how an AI interprets instructions and in structuring prompts to yield the most accurate, creative, and high-quality responses possible.
Our objective is to work together to transform a basic idea into a superior-quality prompt. We will measure the quality of our prompt against the following Pillars of Excellence:
Role & Goal: The AI's role and the user's ultimate goal are unambiguously defined.
Clarity & Specificity: The language is precise, using concrete terms and eliminating ambiguity.
Comprehensive Context: All necessary background information, including the purpose of the task, is provided.
Step-by-Step Instructions: The task is broken down into a logical and actionable sequence.
Constraints & Boundaries: Clear rules are set for what the AI should and should not do.
Output Definition: The desired format, structure, length, and tone of the response are explicitly stated.
Exemplars: High-quality examples are included to guide the AI's output when necessary.
To achieve this, you will strictly adhere to the following Iterative Refinement Protocol:
Initiation: You will begin our first interaction by greeting me and asking for the initial concept, goal, or draft of the prompt I want to create.
Analysis & Response Generation: Based on my input, you will generate a single response containing the following three distinct sections: a) Revised Prompt b) Suggestions for Improvement c) Clarifying Questions
Continuation: We will repeat this collaborative cycle. I will provide answers to your questions and further details, and you will integrate this new information into your next "Revised Prompt," "Suggestions," and "Questions." This process will continue until I confirm that the prompt is complete and meets all our criteria.
Now, take a deep breath, embody the role of the Prompt Engineering Architect, and begin by executing Step 1 of our protocol.
The 7 Pillars of a Perfect Prompt
This prompt works so well because it’s built on a solid foundation. Let's break down its "Pillars of Excellence."
1. Role & Goal 🎯
This defines the AI's persona and your objective. By telling the AI who it is (a "Prompt Engineering Architect") and what you want to achieve ("transform a basic idea into a superior-quality prompt"), you set the stage for a focused and relevant response.
2. Clarity & Specificity ✍️
Precise language eliminates ambiguity. Notice the prompt doesn't just say "make the prompt better"; it specifies "exceptionally clear, detailed, and effective" and defines what quality means.
3. Comprehensive Context 🗺️
This provides the "why" behind the task. The prompt explains that the goal is to work together to refine prompts, giving the AI the background it needs to understand the purpose of its actions.
4. Step-by-Step Instructions ⚙️
Complex tasks are broken down into a logical sequence. The "Iterative Refinement Protocol" (Initiation, Analysis, Continuation) gives the AI a clear, actionable workflow to follow.
5. Constraints & Boundaries ⛔
Clear rules prevent the AI from going off-topic. The prompt instructs the AI to strictly adhere to the protocol and to structure its response into three specific sections, leaving no room for deviation.
6. Output Definition ✅
This specifies the format, tone, and structure you want. The prompt explicitly demands a response containing three distinct sections: "Revised Prompt," "Suggestions for Improvement," and "Clarifying Questions." You get exactly what you ask for.
7. Exemplars ⭐
A good example is the most direct way to guide an AI. While this initial prompt sets up a system, a follow-up could include a "bad" prompt and a "good" one to give the AI a concrete model of the desired transformation.
But Isn't This... A Lot of Work? 🤔
Looking at the example, you might be thinking, "Writing all that takes too much time!"
It's true that it requires more effort upfront. But ask yourself: do you care about the result? If the answer is yes, then you should invest the time to achieve the best possible one.
A few minutes spent writing a detailed prompt will save you from the frustrating cycle of re-generating answers and editing a mediocre output. It's the difference between getting a useless draft and a high-quality, actionable result on the first try.
Your Turn to Experiment 🚀
The best way to grasp this concept is to try it yourself. Stop chatting with your AI and start giving it a job.
Your Call to Action: Take a task you regularly perform. Instead of using a one-sentence question, try building a detailed prompt for it using the 7 Pillars we discussed. Use the case study above as a template. See the difference in quality for yourself.
Have questions or want to share a prompt you've built? Let me know!
Top comments (8)
I follow an iterative approach when working with LLMs, which delivers excellent results.
The algorithm is straightforward: first, I upload a code fragment for analysis — this way the model gets the necessary context.
Then I clearly formulate the task. After receiving the result, I adjust the direction of work, specify the desired response format (detailed or concise), and repeat the feedback cycle until achieving the optimal solution.
This gradual fine-tuning allows me to get exactly the result I need.
Sounds as very good approach, but there will be times when it cause more confusion than value. 🤔
I have a suggestion for you 🧪 - first try to get the expected result for a complex question as tou always get and right after that try my approach - start with provided prompt to customize the actual prompt for your task. After that use the generated prompt for the solution.
I am very curious about the comparison between the two outcomes.
Please, let me know how it works out for you 🙏
I have some experience creating character bots, and this approach was indeed useful in the past.
However, with new generations of LLMs, I've noticed an interesting pattern — they demonstrate excellent performance even without pre-configuring them for specific roles.
Moreover, I've become curious about first giving the model freedom to express its natural response style, and then, if necessary, guiding it in the right direction.
Modern models have become so advanced that sometimes their own approach to problem-solving turns out to be just as effective as rigidly defined roles.
Sounds interesting, thank you! ❤️
Definitely will dig more into your suggestion and will experiment with your workflow
pretty cool stuff tbh, been wondering if maybe specificity matters more than people think in results you get?
You are absolutely right about the details. Think about that everyone has access to the same LLMs, but most of the users receive a generic response which is not helpful, and the other group automated their entire job.
I provoke you to choose a topic you are passionate about and use the provided prompt. Come back after you see the results and let me know how it turns out 👨🔬
I upload a relevant file for context before the prompt everytime i have the chance. It helps me a lot and generally the llm give me more comprehensive and problem solving focused answers.
Happy to hear it is helping 🤩
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.